thought about shared storage (NFS, Lustre) [closed]

Posted by user134880 on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by user134880
Published on 2012-11-18T20:27:56Z Indexed on 2012/11/18 23:06 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 195

Filed under:
|
|

Possible Duplicate:
Can you help me with my capacity planning?

Now I habe small cluster with total of 8 nodes. 6 of them are computing nodes (apache and vmware) and 2 nodes are for storage.

2 storage nodes are identical. Each storage server is linux box with 8 x 1Tb WD RE4 in soft raid 10. 1st box is master and 2nd is slave. Data is mirrored with DRDB.

We export NFSv4 shares to Apache (for document root) and iSCSI to Vmware. Now all is working pretty good and stable.

But it will be soon time to upgrade our system. I have been thinking of Lustre. Does some one has any real experience with Lustre or NFS medium clusters?

Will it be good idea just to upgrade server and change hdd's to 3Tb ? With NFS we will always have only 2 servers to maintain (one primary and one slave).

Thanks.

QUESTIONS: 1) Does some one used Lustre? In production? I have seen a lot of info about how it is hard to setup Lustre because you need to compile own kernel and patches. It's answers from newbies. Is there some one who has used Lustre for some period of time?

2) About disk upgrades - it's only description of strategy. I'm not asking if it is enough 3Tb or not. I just ask if it is right just to replace hdds instead of adding new server (like with Lustre)

Thanks again.

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about nfs

Related posts about cluster